Passive RFID transponder/machine-mounted antenna and reader system and method for hidden obstacle detection and avoidance

ABSTRACT

A system designed to detect and identify fixed utility objects, such as telephone pedestals, power transformers, man-holes, anchor cables, and the like, that are hidden by heavy overgrowth of vegetation. The system provides for automatic look-ahead detection of such objects during mowing and clearing operations with heavy machinery using passive radio frequency transponder technology to both detect the immediate presence of a tagged object as well as basic identification of the type of object replying to the interrogation. The operator can be signaled audibly and/or visually when a tagged object is detected. The transmitter and antennae are mounted in the cab of a mobile machine for protection from physical damage. An integrated microprocessor performs the requisite algorithms needed to process the reply form one or more RFID (Radio Frequency Identification) tags and generate the alert signals for the operator alerts. Once the object has been located it can be marked and cleared safely by hand thereby preventing severe damage to the tagged equipment. Handheld RIFD programmers are used to load or record important identification and maintenance data in the attached tag for maintenance tracking, latitude-longitude location, asset management, placement of other related underground devices or cables, etc. The transmitter unit and display devices can be powered directly from the machine&#39;s system power.

This nonprovisional utility patent application claims the benefit of oneor more prior filed nonprovisional applications. The present applicationis a Continuation of application Ser. No. 09/927,074, filed on Aug. 9,2001, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,621,417 which is incorporated herein byreference in its entirety.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

(1) Field of the Invention

The present invention relates generally to transponder/reader systemsfor the avoidance of hidden, transponder-tagged objects and, moreparticularly, to a RFID transponder/machine-mounted reader system forthe detection and avoidance of hidden utility fixtures during mowing andclearing operations using heavy machinery and for the storage andtransmission of information related to the transponder-tagged object.

(2) Description of the Prior Art

Public utilities such as electric power, gas lines, telephone cables,etc. crisscross the landscape running through remote and often poorlyaccessible right-of-ways. Periodically, these right-of-ways must bemowed and cleared of tall, dense vegetation, including sapling trees.While the large objects such as the main power line towers are easilyavoided, the right-of-way usually contains much smaller objects such astelephone pedestals. It is difficult and impractical to manually findand mark every pedestal each time the right-of-way is cleared. When atelephone junction pedestal is accidentally destroyed by the mowingequipment, the repairs are expensive and time-consuming to the utilitycompany and at the very least an irritation to the service users. Insome instances where health monitoring or security systems are using thecircuits, the outages resulting from such severe damage can be much moreserious. Based on actual experience, only about 5% of the telephonepedestals within a power right-of-way are marked accurately beforeclearing begins. Thus, a need exists for an effective system forpreventing accidental damage to the communications junctions and otherutility fixtures at a very low cost.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a system of transpondertags/vehicle-mounted reader for hidden obstacle detection and avoidance.

Preferably, the present invention uses passive RFID transponder tagswith a vehicle-mounted reader for the detection and avoidance of hiddenobstacles.

The present invention is further direct to a system of objectidentification to provide detailed information pertaining to the taggedobject.

The present invention is further directed to a method for the detectionand avoidance of hidden obstacles.

Thus, the present invention provides a system of transpondertags/vehicle-mounted reader for hidden obstacle detection and avoidance.

These and other aspects of the present invention will become apparent tothose skilled in the art after a reading of the following description ofthe preferred embodiment when considered with the drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a transponder/reader system for thedetection of hidden objects constructed according to the presentinvention.

FIG. 2 is a detailed view of the user interface according to anembodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the following description, like reference characters designate likeor corresponding parts throughout the several views. Also in thefollowing description, it is to be understood that such terms as“forward,” “rearward,” “front,” “back,” “right,” “left,” “upwardly,”“downwardly,” and the like are words of convenience and are not to beconstrued as limiting terms.

Referring now to the drawings in general, the illustrations are for thepurpose of describing a preferred embodiment of the invention and arenot intended to limit the invention thereto. As best seen in FIG. 1, thedetector system, generally described as 10, includes a transponder 20,in discontinuous radio frequency communication 21 with a machine-mountedRF transponder detection system, generally described as 30. Themachine-mounted RF transponder detection system is composed of an RFinterrogator 40 connected to at least one antenna 50 and the controlhead 60.

More particularly, the transponder 20 is preferably a passive RadioFrequency Identification (RFID) transponder. A passive transponderrequires no battery and contains integrated non-volatile memory thatallows data to be written to and read from individual tags. Thetransponder tag can be programmed with any type of data desired withinthe size constraint of the memory. This programming may be done in thefield at installation or prior to installation. However, it is notnecessary to have any user programming performed for the system to work,as each transponder is factory programmed with a unique identification(ID) number, which is all that is needed for positive detection andidentification. Thus, the transponder may be of a type that onlytransmits a signal to indicate presence, or of a type that can outputother information, such as a unique identifier, specific location,description of the tagged object, maintenance dates, test results, andthe like. For example, the unique identifier may be the TransmissionElectric Facilities Information System (TEFIS) identifier. The locationinformation may be the location based on the global positioning system(GPS) or relative location, such as the relationship of the particularRFID to other RFID transponders or to local buried utilities. Thedescription of the tagged object may include the nature of the equipmenttagged, the responsible utility service provider, and other information.

In the preferred embodiment or best mode, the type of data stored in thetag is virtually unlimited. The current technology for the 915 MHz tagsallows for a total storage capacity of 1024 bits of which 880 areavailable for use in the application. That space would holdapproximately 145 ASCII characters uncompressed. Numeric data is capableof being stored in binary form. It is expected that the memory capacitywill increase as the technology matures; as such the scope of thepresent invention is intended to include such memory capacity increases.The remaining memory in this embodiment, 144 bits, is reserved for tagidentification and format information. A unique 64-bit ID number isassigned to each tag made, another 32 bits are reserved for amanufacturer/tag type code and the last 48 bits are reserved for tagmemory layout which can be different for each type of application. Thefollowing list is representative of the type of data that can be usefulin this application. The formatting and memory allotment following someof the types of data are to demonstrate how the available 880 bits couldbe used. Examples of data that can be stored include: Object Types(8-bit reference code supports 256 types), Telephone Pedestal, FiberOptic Junction, Water Hydrant, Gas Valve, Power Transformer, Guy Wire,Cable anchors, Power Pole, Telephone Pole, Boundary Marker, SurveyControl Point (SCP), Fence, River/Stream, Metal Tower, Road/Highway,Owner (136 bits), Utility Name (96 bits), Emergency Phone Number (40bits), TEFIS Number (32 bits), Location (degrees—48 bits), Latitude (24bits), Longitude (24 bits), Install Date (16 bits), Absolute days sinceJan. 1, 1900, Last Service Date (16 bits), Absolute days since Jan. 1,1900, Local References Count (4 bits), References variable list of up to15 nearby reference points, Local Reference (40 bits), Distance toobject (16 bits—centimeters (655 meters max), Direction to object—16bits—degrees, Object type code—8 bits. Any additional data could beeasily stored in a database indexed to the tag ID number—each of whichis unique in the world.

The transponder's function is to alert the machine operator to thepresence of a hidden object. To perform this task, the transponder needsto provide the operator with an alert signal approximately two secondsprior to the moving machine physically contacting the hidden object.Thus, the time between signal reception by the transponder and alertingof the operator, called the lag time, is preferably as short aspossible, or at least provides for a reasonable response time from theoperator.

The RF transponder detection system interrogates the surrounding areafor tags a multiplicity of times per predetermined period; for thepresent invention embodiment, the surrounding are or transpondervicinity is interrogated approximately 200 times per second. Tests showapparent system lag time to be very small in terms of human reactiontime and closure rates in the range of 5 ft/sec, which provide for areasonable response time by the operator and are considered typical forthis application. In the tests, the alert for a given configurationoccurred at the same physical point for a variety of closing velocities.The majority of the response time is needed for the operator to respondto a visual cue and bring the machine to a stop. On average, theequipment needs to reliably record a target at a range of 10 to 12 feetin moderate undergrowth. The testing that was done showed the equipmentconstructed and configured according to the present invention wascapable of meeting this performance standard.

This lag time is a function of several factors, including at least thedetectable signal range of the system, the reaction time of thetransponder, the physical environment, and the velocity of the machine.Therefore, the transponder according to the present invention preferablyhas a sufficiently short reaction time such that it can alert a vehiclemoving at the highest rated velocity in the most undesirableenvironmental conditions in sufficient time to avoid a collision of themachine and the transponder-tagged object.

Examining the sequence of events in terms of distance when approaching atagged, hidden obstacle using typical operating parameters illustratesthe detection range requirements.

Assuming the case of moderate to heavy cover, which results in thepoorest visibility conditions, the maximum machine speed suggested is of2.5 mph, equaling approximately 3.7 ft/sec. The operator reaction timeis approximately 0.5 seconds, equaling approximately 1.8 ft. The worstcase for the machine stopping distance is 5 ft; in practice the machinecan stop almost instantly. The antenna offset behind the leading edge ofthe cutter head is approximately 3 ft. Therefore, the minimum detectionrange from the front of the machine required is approximately1.8+5.0+3.0=9.8 ft.

Alternatively, if the detection system is designed to alert at least twoseconds before contacting the object, and the operator requires theentire two seconds to stop the machine, the following results areobtained:

A speed of 3.7 ft/sec produces a minimum distance to stop of 3.7ft/sec*2 sec=7.3 ft. The antenna offset behind leading edge of thecutter head is approximately 3 ft.

Therefore, the detection range in front of the leading edge of thecutter head must equal at least 7.3+3.0=10.3 ft.

The estimates agree well with each other and are reasonableapproximations. Hence the minimum detection range requirement for thesystem is 10 to 12 feet.

Conditions that may adversely affect the detection range of the systeminclude the following: signal polarization, vegetation density, water,type of plant or vegetation, contact surfaces, and shielding.Preferably, the following considerations are recommended to ensureproper functioning of the system according to the present invention.

Polarization—The tags and reader antenna should be oriented correctly.Also, other antenna techniques such as circular polarization could beemployed if required.

Vegetation Density—The more scattering elements between the tag and thereader the more the signal will be attenuated.

Water—The wetter the scattering elements are, the more the signal willbe attenuated; however, comparisons between dry and wet brush did notshow a significant loss of performance.

Type of Plant—The type of plant and the size of the leaves madenoticeable differences in the detection range.

Contact surfaces—The tags cannot be placed directly against metal.

Shielding—Metal structures will shield the tags and impair detection.The tags must be located at the apex of any completely metal object toachieve omnidirectional detection.

Other characteristics of the transponder that may affect the responsetime will include the minimum input power level for activation, theinherent delay of the transponder circuitry, the alert signal powerlevel, and the effect of temperature, humidity, RF interference andother environmental conditions on the transponder. Characteristics ofthe machine-mounted components of the system that affect the responsetime include the interrogatory signal power level of the RF interrogator40, the alert signal power level of the transponder, the detectionthreshold of the RF interrogator, and the gain of the antenna.

Because the transponder is preferably a passive transponder, the lowerthe input energy required by it to generate an alert signal, the fartherthe detection range it will have. Therefore, it is desirable that thetransponder operate at frequencies that are less susceptible toenvironmental interference and thus require less power to achieve agiven range. This frequency range is preferably between about 13.5 MHzand 2.45 GHz, more preferably about 915 Mhz. The FCC has set aside aband of frequencies from 902–928 MHz for various purposes. The 915 MHzsystem according to the present invention falls into the spread-spectrumapplication defined in Part 15 of the FCC regulations.

Lower frequencies such as 13.5 MHz are better at penetrating heavyfoliage given all other parameters of the system are held constant.However, “equivalent” antennas for that frequency would have physicaldimensions measuring several feet as opposed several inches making theoverall system much less practical. Thus, higher UHF frequencies allowthe desired smaller antenna geometries to be much more efficient thanthey would be at a lower RFID frequency like 13.5 MHz and offer a goodcompromise over the microwave RFID tags operating at 2.45 Ghz which havevery poor penetration characteristics. Systems currently on the marketoperating in these other two bands typically advertise read ranges incentimeters. Thus, the performance of the tags and the reader atapproximately 915 MHz allows for a smaller antenna geometry and offsetsthe relative reduction in penetrating ability.

The RF interrogator is mounted on the machine and generates aninterrogatory signal that is transmitted via the at least one antenna inthe direction of travel. This signal activates the transponder, andtherefore is of appropriate frequency and power to activate atransponder within the desired detection range. The appropriatefrequency is preferably between about 13.5 MHz and 2.45 GHz, morepreferably about 915 Mhz.

Among the hardware available in the RFID industry today the mostappropriate technologies for this application use 915 MHz as theoperating frequency.

The at least one antenna can be a single antenna or multiple antennae.In the case of use of a single antenna, it can be an omnidirectionalantenna, unidirectional antenna, or a directional antenna, such as adipole antenna or yagi antenna, for increased directionality and range.

Multiple antennae can be used to increase the directionality and/orrange of the system. For example, a phased antenna array can be used.These directional and/or ranging antennae can enhance the ability of theoperator to avoid hidden utility objects.

An alert signal coming from the transponder is received by the antenna,routed through the RF interrogator, and then transmitted to the controlhead. In the control head, generally described as 60 in FIG. 2, thesignal is received by a microprocessor (not shown) that processes thesignal and generates the appropriate output to the user interface 62.The outputs generated may include a sensory alarm to alert the user tothe presence of a transponder within the detectable range of the system.The sensory alarms may be visual, auditory, or any other appropriatesensory alarm, and combinations thereof. For example, in situationswhere there is a high level of background noise, such as mowing highbrush with a tractor-mounted mower, an audible alarm 64 alone may beinsufficient to ensure alerting of the operator, and therefore otheralarms, such as a flashing red light 66, may be installed in the userinterface. The outputs may further include the RFID encoded datapreviously described, such as unique identifier and/or TEFIS number,specific and/or relative location, description of the tagged object, andthe like, displayed in an LCD or similar display 68. These outputs canbe generated by information transmitted from the transponder, or can beinformation that is stored in the control head, and pre-linked to theunique identifier transmitted by the transponder. In systems where thetransponder transmits the specific location of the transponder, and thislocation can be linked to a TEFIS object, no reprogramming of thetransponder is necessary prior to affixing the transponder to a hiddenobject. Information about TEFIS object most closely associatedgeographically with the GPS location of the transponder will bedisplayed on the control head when the transponder alert signal isreceived. In cases where the GPS location of the transponder can beeither transmitted by the transponder or calculated by themicroprocessor as described, and the machine is equipped with a GPSsystem, the direction and distance of the transponder from the machinecan be determined and displayed on the display 68.

Additionally, the control head may be designed to enable simultaneousdetection of multiple transponders. In these cases, the control headwould be designed to provide an indication of how many separate tagswere detected so that the operator would know how many objects needed tobe located and avoided. In systems using multiple antennae, thedirection of the transponders in relation to the machine can be moreaccurately determined. For example, multiple, divergent yagi antennaecan be arrayed to allow the differentiation of the alert signal intosectors; for example, into three sectors such as dead ahead, proximalleft side, and proximal right side. This directional information canthen be displayed via the display 68 or via other appropriate means.

The control head also may include basic functions and indicators such asa power-on indicator 70, an power switch 72, a test switch 74 to allowthe operator to perform a system confidence test, and a reset switch 76that allows the operator to clear alerts manually.

In a preferred embodiment according to the present invention, the systemhas a usable read-range of approximately 15 ft to provide a two to threesecond warning to the operator. The current technology that best suitsthe needs of this system are the IntelliTag products from Intermec,which operate on or about the 915 Mhz frequency. In this embodiment, theinterrogator and antenna configuration transmit proprietary patterns ofRF energy designed to excite a passive tuned transponder circuitcontained in packaged tags attached to an object or alternately integralto the object casing. The placement of the antenna or antennae is suchthat the radiation pattern extends forward of the tractor or otherequipment such that a tagged object would be detected as the machinemoved toward it and an appropriate alert would be given to the equipmentoperator warning him/her of the objects close proximity, thus allowingtime to stop the machine before the objects is contacted physically. Thetransmitter is capable of operating continuously as the mowing operationis carried out. Detection and alerts are all handled automatically. Oncea tagged object is detected it can be located and cleared since itsapproximate location is now known, even though it was previously hiddeneither partially or completely. Once the object has been visuallylocated and can be avoided the operator resets the alert, thus turningoff the lamp and tone. The system is capable of ignoring replies fromthe alerting tag until the replies stop as a result of the machinemoving past the object or turning away from it.

The RF transponder detection system can also be connected via wirelesstechnologies to larger or different databases in a remote location, e.g.an office, far from the immediate area in order to provide additionalinformation to the operator in the field.

A method for detecting and avoiding hidden utility objects includestagging utility objects with preprogrammed passive RFID transponders.The transponders may be programmed during manufacturing or at latertimes, including up to installation. These RFID may be preprogrammedwith a simple presence signal or with more detailed information. Afterthe utility objects have been tagged, the vehicle operator can commenceoperation with a vehicle fitted with the RF transponder detectionsystem. The vehicle operator powers on the RF transponder detectionsystem and commences operation of the vehicle. When a tuned transpondercomes in the detection range of the detection system, the RF transponderdetection system alerts the machine operator to the presence of thetuned transponder. The machine operators stops or slows the forwardprogress of the machine and attempts to locate the tagged utilityobject. If the object is not readily located, the operator stops theforward progress of the machine until the object is located, based uponthe system information indicating the location of an object within apredetermined distance or area. Upon location of the object, theoperator either stops the forward progress of the machine, dismounts,and manually clears the object, or continues the forward progress of themachine and avoids the object. Upon locating the object or stopping theforward motion of the machine, the operator can reset the alert signal,stopping the alert for the immediately detected object.

Certain modifications and improvements will occur to those skilled inthe art upon a reading of the foregoing description. By way of example,the user interface can be expanded to show area maps based on a databaseof known tag locations. The map is capable of automaticallyreregistering itself each time a know tag is encountered. Anotherexample is the connection of the reader via wireless technologies tolarger or different databases in an office far from the immediate areain order to provide additional information to the reader in the field.Also, the system can be connected to the machine and programmed to stopthe machine automatically in case of emergency; for example, if themachines is continuing to approach a detected RFID after sufficientwarning has been given to the operator. Another example is allowingphone lines or other power lines in a pedestal to power an active tag,thus providing extended read ranges. Integrating the system with GPS orDGPS for automatic initialization of newly installed tags is animprovement that can facilitate installation. Another example isintegration of the tag into the body of the telephone pedestal itself,thereby preventing theft and vandalism.

All modifications and improvements have been deleted herein for the sakeof conciseness and readability but are properly within the scope of thefollowing claims.

1. A system for the automatic detection and identification of hiddenaboveground fixed utility objects, comprising: a. at least onetransponder located above ground, which is capable of being tagged to atleast one utility object, for radio frequency communication with anradio frequency (RF) scanner/receiver, for communication with a controlhead; b. the RF scanner/receiver and control head being powered directlyby a power source; wherein, the at least one transponder includes aradio frequency identification transponder that transmits informationrelating to the location of the hidden object; c. the RFscanner/receiver includes at least one antenna and an RF interrogator;and d. the control head includes at least one microprocessor and a userinterface for automatically communicating the identification of theobject; and e. the RF scanner/receiver and the control head areremovably mounted on a mobile machine; thereby providing the operator ofthe machine an adequate alert about the identity and location of theobject, without requiring operator interpretation when the machine comesin proximity of one of the at least one transponder and allowing anoperator of the machine to avoid the at least one object tagged by therespective transponder.
 2. The system of claim 1, wherein the systemprovides to the operator approximately two seconds response time priorto physically contacting the utility object.
 3. The system of claim 1,wherein the RFID operates at a frequency band of approximately 915 MHz.4. The system of claim 1, wherein the RFID outputs the location of thetagged object relative to a predetermined positional reference datum. 5.The system of claim 1, wherein the at least one antenna is a directionalantenna.
 6. The system of claim 5, wherein the directional antenna isselected from the group consisting of a dipole antenna, a yagi antenna,and a unidirectional antenna.
 7. The system of claim 1, wherein the atleast one antenna includes a multiplicity of antennae.
 8. The system ofclaim 7, wherein the antennae comprise a phased array.
 9. The system ofclaim 8, wherein the antennae comprise directional antennae.
 10. Thesystem of claim 7, wherein the antennae comprise ranging antennae. 11.The system of claim 1, wherein the RF interrogator operates at afrequency band of approximately 915 MHz.
 12. The system of claim 1,wherein the user interface indicates the presence of an RFID.
 13. Thesystem of claim 12, wherein the user interface further indicates thedistance of the RFID.
 14. The system of claim 12, wherein the userinterface further indicates the direction of the RFID.
 15. The system ofclaim 1, wherein the user interface indicates RFID information selectedfrom the group consisting of Object Types, Telephone Pedestal, FiberOptic Junction, Water Hydrant, Gas Valve, Power Transformer, Guy Wire,Cable anchors, Power Pole, Telephone Pole, Boundary Marker, SurveyControl Point, Fence, River/Stream, Metal Tower, Road/Highway, Owner,Utility Name, Emergency Phone Number, TEFIS Number, Location, Latitude,Longitude, Install Date, Last Service Date, Local References Count,Nearby reference points, Local Reference, Distance to object, Directionto object degrees, Object type code, and combinations thereof.
 16. Thesystem of claim 1, wherein the user interface provides at least onesensory alarm to alert the user when an RFID is detected.
 17. The systemof claim 16, wherein the at least one sensory alarm is a visual alarm.18. The system of claim 16, wherein the at least one sensory alarm is anaudible alarm.
 19. The system of claim 1, wherein the user interfaceprovides a test function.
 20. The system of claim 1, wherein the userinterface provides a reset control.
 21. The system of claim 1, furtherincluding a GPS locator for providing the location of the machine. 22.The system of claim 21, wherein the microprocessor use the data from theGPS locator and the RFID to compute the distance and direction of theRFID from the machine.
 23. The system of claim 1, further including awireless communicator for allowing wireless communication between thesystem and at least one distant database.
 24. The system of claim 1,wherein the control head is removably mounted on a mobile machine.
 25. Amethod for locating, servicing, and/or troubleshooting hiddenaboveground utility objects, including: tagging the hidden utilityobjects with preprogrammed passive RFID transponders; operating avehicle for locating, servicing, and/or troubleshooting the utilityobject fitted with an RF transponder detection system; decreasing theforward progress of the vehicle when an alert is observed; communicatingwith at least one database and automatically collecting and loading REIDinformation from database; automatically collecting and loading relativeposition data from surveying equipment and GPS derived information;locating the tagged utility object; avoiding the tagged utility object;and resetting the alert signal.
 26. The method according to claim 25,further including the step of programming the RFID transponders atinstallation.
 27. The method according to claim 25, wherein the RFIDtransponders provide information selected from the group consisting ofObject Types, Telephone Pedestal, Fiber Optic Junction, Water Hydrant,Gas Valve, Power Transformer, Guy Wire, Cable anchors, Power Pole,Telephone Pole, Boundary Marker, Survey Control Point, Fence,River/Stream, Metal Tower, Road/Highway, Owner, Utility Name, EmergencyPhone Number, TEFIS Number, Location, Latitude, Longitude, Install Date,Last Service Date, Local References Count, Nearby reference points,Local Reference, Distance to object, Direction to object degrees, Objecttype code, and combinations thereof.
 28. A method as claimed in claim27, comprising detecting and identifying an object fully automatically,autonomously, and positively.
 29. A method as claimed in claim 27,wherein the motion or action of a piece of heavy machinery is stopped atdetection of an RFID transponder.
 30. A method as claimed in claim 27,wherein the identification of an object is aided by position dataderived from locally provided data from other RFID transponders.
 31. Amethod as claimed in claim 27, wherein the identification of an RFIDtransponder is aided by a separate radio navigation signal.
 32. Themethod according to claim 25, further including the step of providing tothe user the alert approximately two seconds prior to physicallycontacting the utility object.
 33. The method according to claim 25,wherein the alert is at least one sensory alarm.
 34. The method of claim33 wherein the at least one sensory alarm is a visual alarm.
 35. Themethod of claim 33, wherein the at least one sensory alarm is an audiblealarm.
 36. An RFID transponder detection system for the detection ofabove-ground objects, comprising: an antenna arranged to broadcast asignal toward locations above the ground and to receive signals fromRFID transponders on above-ground objects, an RF interrogator associatedwith the antenna to supply signals to the antenna for broadcast and tointerpret signals received from RFID transponders; a microprocessorarranged to receive interpreted signals from the RF interrogator;microprocessor programming to process interpreted signals, and toidentify and locate a RFID transponder; wherein a database isoperatively associated with the microprocessor and stores informationabout identifying data in RFID transponders that may be attached toaboveground objects to be detected, and the microprocessor programmingcompares information about detected RFID transponders attached toaboveground objects with information in the database; a GPS system todetermine a geographic location of the REID transponder detection systemand operatively associated with the processor; and a user interface forcommunicating information to a user about a detected RFID transponder.37. An RFID transponder detection system as claimed in claim 36 whereinthe location of a detected RFID transponder is stored in the database.38. An RFID transponder detection system as claimed in claim 36 whereinthe location of a detected RFID transponder is transmitted by the RFIDtransponder.
 39. The system of claim 36 further comprising a vehicle onwhich the RFID transponder detection system is mounted, wherein thedetection system provides an output signal for automatically stoppingthe vehicle.